Missing the point

For the past year I have been drawing attention to the fact that children taken into care during the school year and then placed away from home may well have to change schools at short notice and mid-year. In many cases, schools asked to admit these young people recognise that the Admissions Code provides for priority for looked after children during the admissions round. However, in some cases, schools take an entirely opposite approach to in-year requests for a place and do everything to stall an admission.

Yesterday in parliament, my MP asked a question about this issue:Layla Moran (Oxford West and Abingdon) (LD)​

Looked-after children in Oxfordshire could have to wait for up to six months to get into the secondary school that they need to, primarily because local authorities do not have the directive powers over academies that they do over maintained schools. What is the Minister doing to ensure that the most vulnerable children do not miss a day of school?

Here is the Minister’s response
Nadhim Zahawi

Those most disadvantaged children, to whom the hon. Lady referred, are actually given priority during the admissions process.

https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-14/debates/28B7B87C-B33B-4B69-B2D5-16AF519F3309/OralAnswersToQuestions

The exchange shows how it is necessary to be very precise when wording parliamentary questions, as indeed journalists tell me that it does when wording Freedom of Information requests. The Minister is technically correct, but that answer seems to apply more to the normal admission round for the start of the school year than to casual admissions in-year, as happens when a child is taken into care.

The DfE does need to address this issue. I would ask readers to check what is happening in their locality. Are there children in care being tutored away from schools because a school place cannot be found? How closely is the local authority monitoring this issue and what are the large children’s charities doing about the matter?

It is tough being taken into care and, as the admissions code recognises, we should be ensuring priority in the education of these young people at any time of the year. This includes continuity of provision.

I recognise that there are some areas of the country where there are large numbers of such children being placed and so of these are areas in selective systems further reducing the option of schools that can be approached. Should we offer more boarding school places for such children rather than trying to find foster families or is that too much like returning to institutional care – they is still the issue of how to handle school holidays in those cases.

Being taken into care presents a big risk to the education of a young person. At least trying to ensure that they can be found a school place quickly and that schools recognise the need to transition these newcomers into school life effectively and with sympathy is the least we should ask of a civilised society. Please do not allow these children to be forgotten.

 

5 thoughts on “Missing the point

  1. Lord Agnew is in no doubt – the lives of children in care or at risk of going into care are ‘transformed’ by attending boarding schools. He bases his opinion on the GCSE results of just 33 children over what appears to be a ten year period. I can’t find the actual report but the results have caused controversy because of, among other things, small sample size. (https://schoolsweek.co.uk/research-row-over-norfolk-boarding-school-scheme-for-kids-in-care/).
    What doesn’t appear to have been included in judging the quality of experience for these vulnerable pupils is whether they benefited emotionally or not. Boarding may benefit some pupils but be harmful for others especially if boarded out at a very young age.

    • Janet,

      Thanks for your comment. You cannot separate out the boarding element from the rest of their care package. There may be a case for boarding, but only as part of a total package not an adjunct.

      John

      • Janet,

        I agree entirely. The DfE is also supposed to look at children not just their education. It no longer performs that role and I wonder should be go back to Education Services distinct form Children’s Services?

        John

Leave a comment